From: ncsuj	Date: March 28th, 2008 03:19 pm (UTC)		(Link)

On the fence with #1....I'd need to see him not making that goofy face.

	From: amnewsboy	Date: March 28th, 2008 03:24 pm (UTC)		(Link)

I couldn't get #1 without the goofy face yet still showing his ink.

	From: leorawrs81	Date: March 28th, 2008 03:19 pm (UTC)		(Link)

2/3/4 completely makes up for the sad showing (in my ever so humble opinion) the last two weeks! =)

	From: gromitjc	Date: March 28th, 2008 06:52 pm (UTC)		(Link)

Agreed

	From: zestythelemon	Date: March 29th, 2008 04:59 am (UTC)		(Link)

Thirded.

	From: xtex	Date: March 28th, 2008 03:20 pm (UTC)		(Link)

oh #2... hotness..

he even has a gay name. ;)

	From: nkaray	Date: March 28th, 2008 03:56 pm (UTC)		(Link)

I thought the exact same thing.

	From: topstorylive	Date: April 2nd, 2008 11:50 pm (UTC)		(Link)

All I can think of is Myles Standish, which is SOOOOOO not gay to me.

	From: murg	Date: March 28th, 2008 03:39 pm (UTC)		(Link)

#4 is dreamy like something out of porn!

Number one could have been okay, but he seems like a jerk.

	From: steveuk	Date: March 28th, 2008 05:42 pm (UTC)		(Link)

A large portion of #4 with #2 on the side, please. To go. Now! :-)

	From: nightfly	Date: March 28th, 2008 06:53 pm (UTC)		(Link)

Voted for #3, but #2 ain't too shabby either.

	From: tim_cat	Date: March 28th, 2008 11:56 pm (UTC)		(Link)

This is the best group I have seen ina couple weeks....I think they are all cute but 2,3 and 4 are REALLY cute....#1....without the dorky look on his face could be in the running too...

	From: blusteel	Date: March 29th, 2008 12:45 am (UTC)		(Link)

#4...some more #4...and just a bit more #4 would be great.

	From: topstorylive	Date: April 2nd, 2008 11:49 pm (UTC)		(Link)

#2 is very "not" TPIR-type, which makes him a trifle more hot, but I think I wouldn't go for any of these. But then again I favor dorks, geeks and nerds (for which you should read "guys in glasses").